Is Mark Golding's Jamaican Identity Authentic? The Call for His British Birth Certificate

The story of Mark Golding must be examined through the lens of justice, equity, and the rule of law. It is not simply a matter of political affiliation or personal vendetta but rather a critical issue of accountability and the precedence it sets for our nation. Mark Golding, a prominent figure in Jamaican politics and leader of the People's National Party (PNP), stands accused of a grave offense: obtaining a Jamaican passport by false declaration. If proven true, his actions represent an affront to the integrity of Jamaica's legal and civic systems.

The Case for Deportation: A Matter of Justice

Fraudulent activity, especially concerning citizenship and national identity, is universally condemned. Imagine a scenario where a Jamaican citizen is caught living in the United Kingdom illegally, having falsely obtained a British passport. What would happen? The consequences are predictable and severe: arrest, imprisonment, and eventual deportation. Like any sovereign state, the British government does not condone deceit in citizenship matters. This raises the question: Why should Jamaica, a proud nation with its legal frameworks, tolerate such behavior from anyone, particularly someone who holds a position of power and influence?

The Double Standards at Play

Mark Golding's case highlights a glaring double standard in Jamaica's approach to justice. Ordinary Jamaicans, particularly those from underprivileged backgrounds, face the full brunt of the law for far lesser offenses. They are arrested, prosecuted, and punished without hesitation. Yet, when a figure like Golding—privileged by wealth, race, and status—is accused of a crime, the wheels of justice appear to turn slowly, if at all.

Consider Admiral Bailey, a well-known Jamaican entertainer arrested and charged for holding two Jamaican passports. The law was applied to him without fear or favor. Why, then, should Golding be treated differently? Justice must be impartial to wealth, status, or political affiliation. To allow Golding to evade accountability is to send a dangerous message: that there are two Jamaicas—one for the privileged and another for everyone else.

The Implications of His Actions

If the allegations against Golding are true, his actions undermine the sanctity of Jamaican citizenship. A passport is not merely a document but a symbol of national identity and sovereignty. By allegedly obtaining a passport through fraud, Golding would have compromised the values that bind Jamaicans together as a nation. Such actions cannot be overlooked or excused, irrespective of his Jamaican-born wife or political standing.

The Call for Action

Deportation is not a step to be taken lightly but is necessary in this context. Mark Golding's alleged actions strike at the heart of Jamaica's identity as a sovereign state governed by laws. His continued presence in Jamaica without facing the consequences of his alleged fraud would erode public trust in the justice system and reinforce the perception that some individuals are above the law.

Jamaicans must demand accountability. Protests at the offices of the Major Organized Crime and Anti-Corruption Agency (MOCA) and the Prime Minister are not just warranted but essential. These demonstrations should serve as a reminder to the authorities that the people will not tolerate double standards. Golding's case must be treated with the same rigor and urgency as any other case of fraudulent activity.

A Warning for the Future

This is about Mark Golding and the principles shaping Jamaica's future. Will Jamaica continue to allow individuals, particularly those of privilege, to exploit the system? Or will it rise to the challenge of ensuring that justice is applied equally to all, regardless of status? The deportation of Mark Golding would signal that Jamaica is serious about upholding the rule of law and protecting its sovereignty.

As Jamaicans, we must remember that our nation's independence and integrity are rooted in our commitment to justice. Mark Golding's case is a test of that commitment. Let us rise to the occasion, not out of malice, but out of a solemn duty to our nation and future generations.